Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 08:50

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do people reject the usage of the Cursor IDE?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Aurora borealis lights up northern Nevada, Carson City skies - Carson Now
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Change Your Gmail Password Now, Google Tells 2 Billion Users - Forbes
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is your response when someone says "how may I help you"?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
PGA Tour Announces Unfortunate News About Multiple Golfers During US Open - Athlon Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What ended your relationship with your best friend?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Colonoscopy vs. stool tests: Doctors found out which is better at detecting cancer - Earth.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.